HTML Counter
Website Hit Counter The Anarcho-Feminist
holaafrica:

We Can Do It! The most relevant part of that statement is “we”. If your womanism, motherism and/or feminism excludes other women on the basis of their race, age, ability, body type, genitalia and/or any other random or immutable characteristic then you’re not playing cricket.
#AfroQueerNation

holaafrica:

We Can Do It! The most relevant part of that statement is “we”. If your womanism, motherism and/or feminism excludes other women on the basis of their race, age, ability, body type, genitalia and/or any other random or immutable characteristic then you’re not playing cricket.

#AfroQueerNation

I’ve lost count of the number of times I’ve had to switch porno off because I’ve felt it was misogynistic or formulaic, but that doesn’t mean I want my consumption of porn to be regulated. […] Instead of being squeamish and reluctant to discuss porn, it would be more productive if people could focus on asking why there isn’t more readily available porn that caters to all sexes and, crucially, understand why this is important in reflecting gender equality.
Reblogged from sex is not the enemy
For me, the most important insight that feminism has given me is that we do not live, love, consume, and decide in a vacuum; we do so under the influence of society. That doesn’t mean we don’t have “free will” (and I do hate to get into that debate), but it does mean that we might not always be aware of all of the reasons for which we want (or don’t want) to do something. We will probably never be able to disentangle ourselves from the influence of society, and that’s fine. What’s important to me is to be aware of what some of those influences might be.
Reblogged from
As much as we get praised for loving our full bodies, many young white women would rather be dead than wear a size 14. They nod their heads and say how great it is that we black women can embrace our curves, but they don’t want to look like us. They don’t adopt our presumably more generous beauty ideals. White women have even told me how lucky black women are that our men love and accept our bodies the way they are. I’ve never heard a white woman say that she’s going to take her cue from black women and gain a few pounds, however. In a way it is patronizing, because they’re basically saying, “It’s OK for you to be fat, but not me. You’re black. You’re different.”

In this society we have completely demonized fat. How many times have you had to tell a friend of yours that she isn’t fat? How many times has she had to tell you the same thing? Obviously, when people have unrealistic perceptions of themselves it should not go unnoticed, but in this act, while we are reassuring our friends, we put down every woman who is overweight. The demonization of fat and the ease of associating black women with fat exposes yet another opportunity for racism. If we really want to start talking more honestly about all women’s relationships with our bodies, we need to start asking the right questions.

Sirena J. Riley, “The Black Beauty Myth” (via wretchedoftheearth)

Why white fat activists need to sit the fuck down and shut the fuck up with their fucking racist ass “Black men LOVE fat women” bullshit.

NO THE FUCK THEY DON’T.

Fat Black women are DESPISED. We are always blamed for the vitriol that we receive, because Mammy deserves to be hated when she dares try to come out of her station.

(via sourcedumal)

I think also that just because we have weight standards that aren’t as restrictive as whites, it doesn’t mean their isn’t restriction for fat Black women or that they never get ridiculed. Their is a lot of fucked up ways of teasing fat Black women within the community white people wouldn’t even recognize. And when black men treat white fat women differently than black fat women its saying lots

(via strugglingtobeheard)

Reblogged from SH-SHAAAAAAAH!!!

Men get to feel hornier because they’re socially supported in this. The whole of society is geared toward titillating men and discouraging female sexual desire. It’s inherent to the Nice Guy® complaint, where men are entitled to feel physical attraction, but a woman who wants more than “nice” is shallow. It’s evident in the way men and women dress, with women always mindful to wear stuff that makes them sexually attractive, whereas men have the opposite problem, and have to avoid being too sexualized lest they seem feminine. Naked women are draped over every inch of public space, and the internet is full of visually interesting porn for men, but our society barely can imagine what it would be like to try to attract a female eye. Men seem hornier in no small part because their sexuality is celebrated and codified. It’s easy for men to know right away how to be sexual, whereas women are still largely expected to figure it out for themselves—-and even that’s a recent invention, because pre-feminism, women were mostly just expected to do what men wanted.

But even with the small amount of freedom we have, it’s worth noting that a 30-year-old woman who admitted obliquely to having had non-procreative sex in Congress created a month long, nationwide scandal. Until that kind of pressure disappears completely, we can’t even begin to measure what the “natural”, unadulterated female sexuality would look like, and how it would compare to the celebrated and constantly titillated male sexuality.

Either way, stop blaming sex for misogyny. If all men wanted was women to fuck them more, the English language wouldn’t even have the word “slut” in it.

Reblogged from sexstainability
Let me reiterate that to you: If facials or any other sex act makes you feel bad, gross uncomfortable or degraded, then you should not do it ever. That is wrong. But men aren’t the only ones who like things they see in porn. In my case, there’s nothing degrading about receiving a desired sex act I’ve asked for as a consenting adult. Sex acts are degrading when they make you feel degraded — and nobody gets to decide that but you, not even feminism.

-Emily McCombs, Do Women Like Facials? (via catarangs)

“Sex acts are degrading when they make you feel degraded — and nobody gets to decide that but you, not even feminism.” YES THANK YOU.

—BB

(via fuckyeahsexpositivity)

commie-pinko-liberal:

I’ve been working on some political pin designs lately. A lot of them are made with watercolor designs that I painted by hand and scanned.
I’m going to do a giveaway of these designs and a few more next week. :)
If you can’t wait for the giveaway, you can get some pins here on ebay.

commie-pinko-liberal:

I’ve been working on some political pin designs lately. A lot of them are made with watercolor designs that I painted by hand and scanned.

I’m going to do a giveaway of these designs and a few more next week. :)

If you can’t wait for the giveaway, you can get some pins here on ebay.

Reblogged from The story of an almost

albabaeza:

À propos de la condition féminine, par Marguerite Yourcenar, 1981.

Sobre la condición femenina, por Marguerite Yourcenar, 1981.

Reblogged from sexgenderbody
… women make gender visible, but most men do not know they are gendered beings. Courses on gender are still populated mostly by women. Most men don’t see that gender is as central to their lives as it is to women’s. The privilege of privilege is that its terms are rendered invisible. It’s a luxury not to have to think about race, class, or gender. Only those marginalized by some category understand how powerful that category is when deployed against them.
— Michael Kimmel, A Black Woman Took My Job (via fuckyeahfeministartandliterature)
Reblogged from sophie.
I am distrustful of anyone who says they prefer the label “humanist” to “feminist.” You’ve heard the argument before. It’s an attempt to downplay oppression against women and avoid acknowledging male privilege. “Humanist” is taken. It has a definition. It’s a life philosophy that affirms humans’ ability and responsibility to lead ethical lives of personal fulfillment guided by reason and compassion rather than supernaturalism. Many humanists are feminists and vice versa but “humanist” isn’t just a word you made up, bub.

Co-opting “humanist” is disingenuous and lazy. Not all humans are on a level playing field. There is inequality between men and women (and among women), and the feminist movement seeks to rectify that. It was called the “feminist” movement for a reason.
Reblogged from Open your mind

Muslim Feminisms vs White Feminist

Dear Anarcho-Feminist,

Nasreen (Vanessa) and I have written about multiple feminism in response to increase Islamophobia and xenophobia iin North America and Europe. We wanted to highlight the issues we face as anarcho-feminists and thus wanted to share it with you as part of submission. http://independent.academia.edu/VanessaRivera/Papers/1775858/Towards_a_Recognition_of_Multiple_feminism_The_Voice_of_Muslim_Women

Regards,
Ayesha & Nasreen

————————————————————————————————

Interesting article submitted to me about islamophobia and what you could call feminationalism, or colonialist feminism. Read and learn!

Trans people have often been described as those whose physical sex does not match the gender of their mind or soul. This explanation might make sense intuitively, but it is nonetheless problematic for transfeminism. To say that one has a female mind or soul would mean there are male and female minds that are different from each other in some identifiable way, which in turn may be used to justify discrimination against women. Claiming an essential gender identity can be just as dangerous as resorting to biological essentialism.
Transfeminism believes that we construct our own gender identities based on what feels genuine, comfortable, and sincere to us as we live and relate to others within given social and cultural constraints. This holds true for those whose gender identity is in congruence with their birth sex, as well as for trans people. Our demand for recognition and respect shall in no way be weakened by this acknowledgment. Instead of justifying our existence through reverse essentialism, transfeminism dismantles the assumption that sex and gender ‘naturally’ cohere.
— Emi Koyama
When, as happened recently in France, an attempt is made to coerce women out of the burqa rather than creating a situation in which a woman can choose what she wishes to do, it’s not about liberating her, but about unclothing her. It becomes an act of humiliation and cultural imperialism. It’s not about the burqa. It’s about the coercion. Coercing a woman out of a burqa is as bad as coercing her into one. Viewing gender in this way, shorn of social, political and economic context, makes it an issue of identity, a battle of props and costumes. It is what allowed the US government to use western feminist groups as moral cover when it invaded Afghanistan in 2001. Afghan women were (and are) in terrible trouble under the Taliban. But dropping daisy-cutters on them was not going to solve their problems.
— Arundhati Roy (via jahanzebjz)
Reblogged from Moving Forward